Strongest Bond in Chemistry - Is Science Created Equal to Morality?

Strongest Bond in Chemistry - Is Science Created Equal to Morality?One of the strongest bonds in chemistry is the one between science and nature. The two are often seen as antithetical, and for many years this relationship has been strong and the themes of science fiction have explored how science and the supernatural go hand in hand. Science has been largely credited with creating modern man; but what else are they responsible for? The answer is that science has enabled us to explore the mysteries of nature and discover the values in life, whether these be the morals of a person or the best manner of loving one another.Today we know that science and the moral universe were inextricably linked, but it was only in the 20th century that scientists began to make the connection between science and morality. However, it is interesting to note that in most societies around the world, people go about their lives most of the time ignoring the moral aspect of science, even though they are dee ply convinced of its benefits. Perhaps this is because science is not viewed as a source of information that can be used for making moral decisions, but as something to be dispensed with.This weak and impotent bond, this feeling that science is inherently capable of meddling with the fabric of morality, would seem to indicate that morality is a strong bond in chemistry. But actually, science and morality go hand in hand, because it is through morality that the bonds of morality are established. The new generation is being taught in schools that morality is a matter of personal choice, but for many years, this was considered heresy.Though you may be curious about the origins of this concept, moral lessons have been taught since the beginning of the world, but especially in these modern times, in a culture that seeks to deny any connection between science and morality, such lessons are anathema. At the same time, morality is increasingly being viewed as something we are born with, rat her than something we learn in school, which is in stark contrast to the viewpoint of society.There has also been an attempt to undermine the idea that morality is founded on science, but what this assertion really suggests is that morality is not influenced by science, in fact, morality is the product of a systematic study of the connections between science and the moral universe. This is highly controversial, but there are those who argue that religion is responsible for ignoring the role that science plays in morality.In other words, if we are going to support a negative view of morality, then we must be supporting a view of morality based on one individual or group, rather than all members of society having a similar view of what is right and wrong. If morality is all down to one man or woman, then what does it say about the morality of society? Is it fair to say that no one is truly moral?Moralists believe that society should not be told what is right and wrong, but should be t aught to respect each other as human beings. Thus, it is the duty of science to tell us about the implications of our actions, so that we can form moral judgments. And for some reason, it seems that moral teachings are more important than moral action, which implies that ethics is not really based on knowledge of the consequences of our actions, but the lack of knowledge, and that science is seen as the final arbiter of what is right and wrong.